SCMP TOM PLATE CHINA
COLUMN #12 NOV 9, 2015
SHOULD THE XI JINPING CHARM OFFENSIVE SOUND AN ALARM?
And Why Taiwan President Ma Leaves With Such Low Ratings
BY TOM PLATE
China’s new focused
diplomacy, as viewed in an off-balance U.S., is close to remarkable. After all the
past foreign-policy fog, through which it was sometimes hard to see where Beijing
stood, we now have the Xi Jinping road show taking all sorts of stands at all
sorts of splashy stops. It is an amazement of activity. Today in the
U.S., there may be almost as many think tanks, from Washington to Santa Monica,
trying to parse Xi’s new chess moves as pollsters tracking our many
presidential candidates!
In recent weeks, you saw
China’s president in the U.S., addressing its business best and richest, then bopping
to D.C, for formal state visit, etc.; in London, hobnobbing with the Queen,
then all but being knighted by seal-the-deal Brits; then Xi quick-stepping and
happy-speaking in Hanoi (people there clapping not so loud); and in Singapore, shaking
hand to hand, meeting mister-to-mister, with Taiwan’s leader, all in seeming respect.
Activity is not the
same thing as achievement, of course. You can trot around the globe until your
eardrums feel permanently popped and yet wind up with little more to show for
it other than yet more frequent-flier miles and business cards. Personal
diplomacy that’s solely personal won’t go sticky unless a nation’s core
interests are behind the smiles. China’s president and his glamorous wife Peng
Liyuan, as much as they may relish the high life of first-class travel, are on
a serious, if sometimes entertaining, mission to hike China’s diplomacy to the
next level.
Geopolitically
speaking, the Taiwan impasse is one of the toughest on the diplomatic discord
list, as it is the declared core interest of the People’s Republic of China to
lure, or compel, Taiwan to accept the sovereignty of Beijing. Maybe half the people on the substantial island of Taiwan oppose
integration, and maybe the other half support it – as (no maybes here) do countless
Mainland inhabitants, hoping for a kind of ‘come-home-again’ sequel to the unforgettable
1997 Hong Kong hand-back.
Since 2008, Taipei
and Beijing have been not getting into one another’s hair, all things
considered. One plus has been the Obama administration’s inclination to keep its
nose mainly out of it - and our annoyingly preachy voice mainly down. That has helped
a lot: U.S. diplomacy is sometimes best when publicly it says least (we are not
always good at this). A related plus was the programmatic pragmatism of the
greatly under-appreciated President Ma Ying-jeou.
Taking office in 2008, and immediately seeking out trade, tourism and other
easy connections, Ma managed to downplay the icy-dicey stuff, particularly the
fraught matter of sovereignty. But in Taiwan’s politics, as so often in life,
no good deed tends to go unpunished for long: Ma can expect to leave next year
after two terms with pitiful public-opinion ratings - and the probability of
his presidency ignominiously falling into the hands of the opposition whose independence
party platform places Taipei directly at odds with Beijing and could try to undo
everything Ma has achieved.
China President Xi would love to see
his Singapore handshake somehow scare up the necessary votes to help Ma’s
Kuomintang party (as if a fixer like Richard J. Daley, iconic mayor of Chicago from
1955–1976 who never lost an election that could be bought!). Ah, but Beijing’s
track record is not good: the Mainland’s last run at Taiwan voters, by un-subtly
shooting off rockets in the island’s very general direction before the 1996
election, only insured a romp for the very candidate Beijing loathed. Xi’s weekend play in Singapore was far
more subtle and statesmanlike, and commendable. Beyond the January election, which
every expert says is lost to the anti-integration opposition (and Xi knows this
too), the Chinese president has now laid down a minimum standard of cross-strait
diplomatic conduct – and one of his own making. Hold back no applause: Sure, it’s
a charm offensive, no question. But it could help.
Regarding speculation that Xi timed the pulling of the
Singapore rabbit out of his hat in anticipation of the Taiwan election: maybe.
But it’s just as possible the Chinese are focused on the unfolding American election.
Taiwan has been a campaign issue in the U.S. before, notably in 1960 when Quemoy
(Kinmen) and Matsu came up. Taiwan could come up again, but Xi’s extension of
respect to the leader of Taiwan puts his government in better position to claim
its rise remains peaceful, even over this issue. The “one-minute handshake”, as
dubbed by the media, produced photos from Singapore’s Shangri-La Hotel that
offered a lot better image of China than missile tantrums.
In 2002 then Chinese Vice President Hu Jintao
bluntly warned America: "If
any trouble occurs on the Taiwan question, it would be difficult for China-U.S.
relations to move forward, and a retrogression may even occur." Everyone
knows that U.S. military backing of Taiwan annoys Beijing no end, but Xi’s
decision to shake that off, for the time being anyhow, suggests that quality relations
with the U.S. remains the higher priority. The Democratic Progressive Party may
well triumph in January, but Beijing is placing the bet that if China-U.S.
relations do deteriorate over new Taiwan tensions, the fault will be seen to
rest with neither Xi nor Ma’s party, but with people inside Taiwan who refuse
to accept the reality of the 21st century.
In fact, Tsai Ing-wen, DPP opposition leader, actually condemned the
Xi-Ma meeting. This is unconscionable. China’s rise proceeds apace, whether you like it or not.
Everyone has to adjust positions accordingly – and preferably peacefully. No
one will get everything they want.
Columnist
Tom Plate, the Distinguished Scholar of Asian and Pacific Studies at Loyola
Marymount University in Los Angeles, is the author of the book ‘In the Middle
of China’s Future’ and the “Giants of Asia’ book series.
No comments:
Post a Comment